@korvolambda this post got me looking into the dude, really interesting, He criticized the antinuke movement for being funded by the oil companies and that took me down a rabbit hole, it's 100% true, Exxon BP etc were astroturfing back in the 50's and still give millions to Greenpeace, the Sierra Club etc.
@korvolambda Not to say there no legit concerns about nuclear power especially in the 70's or there wasn't an organic component but it really raises some issues for history of environmentalist and anarchist movements in north america, as Earth First, Food Not Bombs ALF/ELF both primmies and post civ, the practice of consensus decision making all can trace their lineage to anti nuclear movement in the 70's; when the (primarily white) left after the 60's went into environmental issues
@korvolambda god damn white hippies taking oil money, no wonder they loved those VW micro-buses so much
@tech_prole he has a lot of things under his umbrella (having living an active life past 103 yrs old). One of those was that he is probably one of the people behind the invention of the microwave...although its probably just false info.
Nonetheless he has some interesting points of view about science and the limitations of that "framework" of thinking and that sometimes an "intuitive" and less logical approach can be better
@korvolambda yeah i gotta read his stuff, iheard gaia theory mentioned usually in a dismissive way over the years, but understanding the earth and various subsystems as a living or at least self correcting system isn't that far fetched, tho there isn't an easy way to "prove" that empirically.
the human body is made up of zillions of micro-organism, organic life is ultimately a physical process; a state of matter, whose to say planets stars galaxies etc don't have similar emergent properties.
@korvolambda tho talk about intuitive modes of thinking has certain dangers, with gaia theory in particular seems to lend itself to pantheism/animism and/or spiritual/mystical modes of thinking
Carl Jung was big onintuition, his theory of synchronicity, defined in the movie Repo man as "a lattice of coincidence" underlying reality it's basically schizophrenic paranoid delusional thinking that everything is connected and everything that happens has *intent* behind it. think gang stalking
@korvolambda skimmed thru Jung's Red book one time, what a trip
I think there's a balance to be had, we can be scientific/emperical/materialist in worldly matters while having a little mysticism as a treat
When it comes to social issues it's basically impossible to have a hard science of the social, intuition is key, psychology, economics, sociology all basically psuedo or proto sciences, and a crude math and data social theory is usually furthest from reality, often thinly veiled ideology.
@tech_prole I think you comparison with Jung is actually right on the spot. You can say that James Lovelock is kind of the Jung in the scientific community. In the end, Gaia's theory has been more or less disproveed but even then I think it was valuable in order to put a reality check in the blid confidence that we almost always deposit in "science", sometimes missing the point in the bigger picture.
@tech_prole he say it more in the way of beign an autoregulated system rather than some "living" entity but lots of hippies when the first Gaia book came out took it as if Earth was a conscious entity
Hispagatos - Anarcho hacker collective a(A)a - A Hacker culture and a Anarchist hacker friendly mastodon instance.